Home > Promising Practices > The Cross-Cultural Workgroup on Tobacco

The Cross-Cultural Workgroup on Tobacco

A Good Idea

This practice has been Archived and is no longer maintained.

Description

The Washington Department of Health convened a Cross-Cultural Workgroup on Tobacco to identify populations disparately affected by tobacco use. The membership includes representatives from organizations working with African American, American Indian, Asian American/Pacific Islander, Hispanic/Latino, gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgender, pregnant, low-income, and faith-based populations. Washington is developing a strategic plan to identify and reduce tobacco-related disparities and a marketing plan to educate community leaders of diverse populations about the strategic plan and to engage them in its implementation.

Goal / Mission

The goal of this program is to reduce tobacco use among groups experiencing the most pronounced tobacco-related disparities.

Results / Accomplishments

During the strategic planning process, the state program funded six populations to assess their capacity and readiness to implement tobacco prevention and control activities and evaluated the strategic planning process.

About this Promising Practice

Organization(s)
The Washington Department of Health
Primary Contact
No current contact information available
Topics
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Health / Cancer
Organization(s)
The Washington Department of Health
Source
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Steps to a Healthier U.S.
Date of publication
2003
Location
Washington
Target Audience
Women, Racial/Ethnic Minorities

Related Promising Practices

  1. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Decreasing Tobacco Use Among Workers: Incentives & Competitions to Increase Smoking Cessation
  2. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Increasing Tobacco Use Cessation: Increasing the Unit Price of Tobacco Products
  3. Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program
  4. Not-On-Tobacco (N–O–T)

More

Related Content for: The Cross-Cultural Workgroup on Tobacco

A Good Idea meets the following HCI criteria:

  1. The program description includes: the sponsoring organization, program goals, program funding source, program implementation steps and outcomes.
  2. The program evaluation is limited to descriptive measure(s) of success/accomplishment (i.e., program participation rates, number of services/education sessions/radio messages provided). Note: oftentimes, the program has been newly implemented and a program evaluation has not yet been conducted. Programs that have not yet been evaluated, but which show promise in improving health or quality of life, are classified as Good Ideas until an evaluation is conducted.
Santa Cruz